https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e
commit r14-9676-gf536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Mar 26 16:40:53 2024 +0100
testsuite: Fix up pr111151.c testcase [PR114486]
Apparently I've somehow screwed up the adjustments of the originally tested
testcase, tweaked it so that in the second/third cases it actually see
a MAX_EXPR rather than COND_EXPR the MAX_EXPR has been optimized into,
and didn't update the expected value.
2024-03-26 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/111151
PR testsuite/114486
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c (main): Fix up expected value for
f.
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c
index 89255d28054..063617f5b9c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ main ()
int d = (-__INT_MAX__ - 1) / 2;
int e = 10;
int f = (d * 2 > e * 5 ? d * 2 : e * 5) * 6;
- if (f != 120)
+ if (f != 300)
__builtin_abort ();
int g = (-__INT_MAX__ - 1) / 2;
int h = 0;
