https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91b6c93f98cac71f5588d73191d08ad788e600c

commit r15-2920-gd91b6c93f98cac71f5588d73191d08ad788e600c
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 9 16:14:18 2024 -0400

    c++: ICE with NSDMIs and fn arguments [PR116015]
    
    The problem in this PR is that we ended up with
    
      {.rows=(&<PLACEHOLDER_EXPR struct Widget>)->n,
       .outer_stride=(&<PLACEHOLDER_EXPR struct MatrixLayout>)->rows}
    
    that is, two PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs for different types on the same level
    in one { }.  That should not happen; we may, for instance, neglect to
    replace a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR due to CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY on
    the constructor.
    
    The same problem happened in PR100252, which I fixed by introducing
    replace_placeholders_for_class_temp_r.  That didn't work here, though,
    because r_p_for_c_t_r only works for non-eliding TARGET_EXPRs: replacing
    a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR with a temporary that is going to be elided will
    result in a crash in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl when it encounters such
    a loose decl.
    
    But leaving the PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs in is also bad because then we end
    up with this PR.
    
    TARGET_EXPRs for function arguments are elided in gimplify_arg.  The
    argument will get a real temporary only in get_formal_tmp_var.  One
    idea was to use the temporary that is going to be elided anyway, and
    then replace_decl it with the real object once we get it.  But that
    didn't work out: one problem is that we elide the TARGET_EXPR for an
    argument before we create the real temporary for the argument, and
    when we get it, the context that this was a TARGET_EXPR for an argument
    has been lost.  We're also in the middle end territory now, even though
    this is a C++-specific problem.
    
    A solution is to simply stop eliding TARGET_EXPRs whose initializer is
    a CONSTRUCTOR.  Such copies can't be (at the moment) elided anyway.  But
    not eliding all TARGET_EXPRs would be a pessimization.
    
            PR c++/116015
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * call.cc (convert_for_arg_passing): Don't set_target_expr_eliding
            when the TARGET_EXPR initializer is a CONSTRUCTOR.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * gimplify.cc (gimplify_arg): Do not strip a TARGET_EXPR whose
            initializer is a CONSTRUCTOR.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr23.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/call.cc                            |  7 +++++--
 gcc/gimplify.cc                           | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr23.C | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index 94015db4e650..0fe679aae9fe 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -9468,8 +9468,11 @@ convert_for_arg_passing (tree type, tree val, 
tsubst_flags_t complain)
   if (complain & tf_warning)
     warn_for_address_of_packed_member (type, val);
 
-  /* gimplify_arg elides TARGET_EXPRs that initialize a function argument.  */
-  if (SIMPLE_TARGET_EXPR_P (val))
+  /* gimplify_arg elides TARGET_EXPRs that initialize a function argument,
+     unless the initializer is a CONSTRUCTOR.  In that case, we fail to
+     elide the copy anyway.  See that function for more information.  */
+  if (SIMPLE_TARGET_EXPR_P (val)
+      && TREE_CODE (TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (val)) != CONSTRUCTOR)
     set_target_expr_eliding (val);
 
   return val;
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
index 71cc6c38d807..26a216e151d6 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
@@ -3760,7 +3760,22 @@ gimplify_arg (tree *arg_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, location_t 
call_location,
        {
          tree init = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (*arg_p);
          if (init
-             && !VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (init)))
+             && !VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (init))
+             /* Currently, due to c++/116015, it is not desirable to
+                strip a TARGET_EXPR whose initializer is a {}.  The
+                problem is that if we do elide it, we also have to
+                replace all the occurrences of the slot temporary in the
+                initializer with the temporary created for the argument.
+                But we do not have that temporary yet so the replacement
+                would be quite awkward and it might be needed to resort
+                back to a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR.  Note that stripping the
+                TARGET_EXPR wouldn't help anyway, as gimplify_expr would
+                just allocate a temporary to store the CONSTRUCTOR into.
+                (FIXME PR116375.)
+
+                See convert_for_arg_passing for the C++ code that marks
+                the TARGET_EXPR as eliding or not.  */
+             && TREE_CODE (init) != CONSTRUCTOR)
            *arg_p = init;
        }
     }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr23.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr23.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2f5b8ca97bf7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr23.C
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// PR c++/116015
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-c++20-extensions" }
+
+struct MatrixLayout {
+    int rows         = 0;
+    int outer_stride = rows;
+};
+struct Matrix {
+    Matrix(MatrixLayout m) {}
+};
+struct Widget {
+    int n = 5;
+    Matrix A0{{}};
+    Matrix A1{{n}};
+    Matrix A1_{{.rows = n}};
+    Matrix A2{{n, n}};
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ Widget w{};
+ Widget w1;
+ Widget w2 = {};
+}

Reply via email to