https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3f02493dfa8858c3fb2bc0da0d6d7320921408a

commit r15-7103-gf3f02493dfa8858c3fb2bc0da0d6d7320921408a
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jan 16 11:22:59 2025 -0500

    c++: fix wrong-code with constexpr prvalue opt [PR118396]
    
    The recent r15-6369 unfortunately caused a bad wrong-code issue.
    Here we have
    
      TARGET_EXPR <D.2996, (void) (D.2996 = {.status=0, 
.data={._vptr.Foo=&_ZTV3Foo + 16}})>
    
    and call cp_fold_r -> maybe_constant_init with object=D.2996.  In
    cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr we now take the type of the object
    if present.  An object can't have type 'void' and so we continue to
    evaluate the initializer.  That evaluates into a VOID_CST, meaning
    we disregard the whole initializer, and terrible things ensue.
    
    For non-simple TARGET_EXPRs, we should return ctx.ctor rather than
    the result of cxx_eval_constant_expression.
    
            PR c++/118396
            PR c++/118523
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): For non-simple
            TARGET_EXPRs, return ctx.ctor rather than the result of
            cxx_eval_constant_expression.  If TYPE and the type of R don't
            match, return the original expression.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue4.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-prvalue3.C: New test.
    
    Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.cc                             |  9 ++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue4.C | 33 ++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-prvalue3.C | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index 7ff38f8b5e52..9f950ffed749 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -8983,6 +8983,11 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool 
allow_non_constant,
   r = cxx_eval_constant_expression (&ctx, r, vc_prvalue,
                                    &non_constant_p, &overflow_p);
 
+  /* If we got a non-simple TARGET_EXPR, the initializer was a sequence
+     of statements, and the result ought to be stored in ctx.ctor.  */
+  if (r == void_node && !constexpr_dtor && ctx.ctor)
+    r = ctx.ctor;
+
   if (!constexpr_dtor)
     verify_constant (r, allow_non_constant, &non_constant_p, &overflow_p);
   else
@@ -9087,7 +9092,9 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool 
allow_non_constant,
     return r;
   else if (non_constant_p && TREE_CONSTANT (r))
     r = mark_non_constant (r);
-  else if (non_constant_p)
+  else if (non_constant_p
+          /* Check we are not trying to return the wrong type.  */
+          || !same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (type, TREE_TYPE (r)))
     return t;
 
   if (should_unshare)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue4.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue4.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..afcee65f8803
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-prvalue4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// PR c++/118396
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-O" }
+
+void *operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, void *__p) { return __p; }
+
+struct Foo {
+  virtual ~Foo() = default;
+};
+struct Data {
+  int status;
+  Foo data{};
+};
+
+Data *P, *Q;
+
+struct vector {
+  vector (const Data &__value) {
+    P = static_cast<Data *>(__builtin_operator_new(0));
+    new (P) Data (__value);
+    Q = P + 1;
+  }
+  Data *begin() { return P; }
+  Data *end() { return Q; }
+};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  vector items_(Data{});
+  for (auto item : items_)
+    item.status == 0 ? void() : __builtin_abort ();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-prvalue3.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-prvalue3.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8ea86c60be52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-prvalue3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// PR c++/118523
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -Wall" }
+
+struct __new_allocator {
+  constexpr __new_allocator() {}
+  __new_allocator(__new_allocator &) {}
+};
+template <typename> using __allocator_base = __new_allocator;
+template <typename> struct allocator_traits;
+template <typename> struct allocator : __allocator_base<int> {};
+template <typename _Tp> struct allocator_traits<allocator<_Tp>> {
+  using pointer = _Tp *;
+  template <typename _Up> using rebind_alloc = allocator<_Up>;
+  static void deallocate(allocator<_Tp>, pointer, long);
+};
+struct __alloc_traits : allocator_traits<allocator<int>> {};
+struct _Vector_impl_data {
+  __alloc_traits::pointer _M_start;
+  __alloc_traits::pointer _M_end_of_storage;
+  constexpr _Vector_impl_data() : _M_start(), _M_end_of_storage() {}
+};
+struct _Vector_impl : __alloc_traits::rebind_alloc<int>, _Vector_impl_data {};
+struct _Vector_base {
+  ~_Vector_base() {
+    _M_deallocate(_M_impl._M_start,
+                  _M_impl._M_end_of_storage - _M_impl._M_start);
+  }
+  _Vector_impl _M_impl;
+  void _M_deallocate(__alloc_traits::pointer __p, long __n) {
+    if (__p)
+      __alloc_traits::deallocate(_M_impl, __p, __n);
+  }
+};
+struct vector : protected _Vector_base {};
+struct S {
+  vector a{};
+};
+struct B2 {
+  B2(S);
+};
+struct E : B2 {
+  E(S opts = {}) : B2{opts} {}
+};
+void fun() { E{}; }

Reply via email to