https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19953f014038b061e7b272e489540080ea8cabc4
commit 19953f014038b061e7b272e489540080ea8cabc4 Author: Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com> Date: Thu Apr 10 17:28:09 2025 -0300 [testsuite] [ppc] allow implicit fuction declarations in pr92661.c gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c expects and tolerates errors about dfp builtins when dfp is not supported, but the C front end no longer accepts calls of undeclared functions by default, even with -w. Adding -fpermissive would do, but I thought it would be too broad, so I went for -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration. for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c: Allow implicit function decls. Diff: --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c index d9500dbfdb71..0eb3c654d2d3 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92661.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-w -O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */ +/* { dg-options "-w -O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration" } */ /* PR92661: The following tests should not ICE, regardless of whether the target supports DFP or not. */