https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efbcd7d7aeda2d8e8fb4670464c8c002b9cc0406
commit efbcd7d7aeda2d8e8fb4670464c8c002b9cc0406
Author: Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Jul 2 21:45:51 2025 -0400
Update ChangeLog.*
Diff:
---
gcc/ChangeLog.bugs | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog.bugs b/gcc/ChangeLog.bugs
index 1937b257c80d..9c802cefdb08 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog.bugs
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog.bugs
@@ -1,3 +1,34 @@
+==================== Branch work214-bugs, patch #110 ====================
+
+PR target/120681 - allow -mcmodel=large with PC relative addressing
+
+When I implemented the pc-relative support for power10 in GCC, I
+disabled using pc-relative support for -mcmodel=large. At the time, I
+didn't want to dig into the issues. It is now time to allow
+-mcmodel=large to generate pc-relative code.
+
+This patch allows -mcmodel=large to use prefixed addressing on power10,
+power11, and possibly other future PowerPC processors in addition to
+the current -mcmodel=medium support.
+
+2025-07-02 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>
+
+gcc/
+
+ PR target/120681
+ * config/rs6000/linux64.h (PCREL_SUPPORTED_BY_OS): Allow large
+ code model as well as medium code model.
+ * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_option_override_internal):
+ Likewise.
+ (rs6000_elf_declare_function_name): Don't create the
+ local/non-local labels for large code model if we are using
+ PC-relative addressing.
+
+gcc/testsuite/
+
+ PR target/120681
+ * gcc.target/powerpc/pr120681.c: New test.
+
==================== Branch work214-bugs, patch #102 ====================
PR target/120528 -- Simplify zero extend from memory to VSX register on power10
