https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe3c79d66f49ae6756c8bfe74e6593ad04ca07ff

commit r17-1093-gfe3c79d66f49ae6756c8bfe74e6593ad04ca07ff
Author: Dhruv Chawla <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue May 19 12:43:32 2026 +0000

    alpha: Fix typos in various files
    
    Signed-off-by: Dhruv Chawla <[email protected]>
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/alpha/alpha.cc (alpha_pass_by_reference): Fix typos.
            (alpha_reorg): Likewise.
            * config/alpha/predicates.md: Likewise.
    
    libgcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/alpha/vms-unwind.h (alpha_vms_fallback_frame_state): Fix 
typos.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc        | 4 ++--
 gcc/config/alpha/predicates.md   | 2 +-
 libgcc/config/alpha/vms-unwind.h | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc b/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc
index f81391bdff2d..9b8433c5bb04 100644
--- a/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.cc
@@ -6415,7 +6415,7 @@ alpha_pass_by_reference (cumulative_args_t, const 
function_arg_info &arg)
 
      This introduces sort of ABI incompatibility, but until _Float32 was
      introduced, C-family languages promoted 32-bit float variable arg to
-     a 64-bit double, and it was not allowed to pass float as a varible
+     a 64-bit double, and it was not allowed to pass float as a variable
      argument.  Passing _Complex float as a variable argument never
      worked on alpha.  Thus, we have no backward compatibility issues
      to worry about, and passing unpromoted _Float32 and _Complex float
@@ -10099,7 +10099,7 @@ static void
 alpha_reorg (void)
 {
   /* Workaround for a linker error that triggers when an exception
-     handler immediatelly follows a sibcall or a noreturn function.
+     handler immediately follows a sibcall or a noreturn function.
 
 In the sibcall case:
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/alpha/predicates.md b/gcc/config/alpha/predicates.md
index b5ff4ab6dab7..68e3ac69f2a1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/alpha/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/alpha/predicates.md
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
     case CONST:
       if (TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS)
        {
-         /* We don't split symbolic operands into something unintelligable
+         /* We don't split symbolic operands into something unintelligible
             until after reload, but we do not wish non-small, non-global
             symbolic operands to be reconstructed from their high/lo_sum
             form.  */
diff --git a/libgcc/config/alpha/vms-unwind.h b/libgcc/config/alpha/vms-unwind.h
index 34ef0ba504ce..a1b0d455f832 100644
--- a/libgcc/config/alpha/vms-unwind.h
+++ b/libgcc/config/alpha/vms-unwind.h
@@ -114,13 +114,13 @@ alpha_vms_fallback_frame_state (struct _Unwind_Context 
*context,
   fs->retaddr_column = RA_COLUMN;
 
   /* If PV designates a VMS exception vector or condition handler, we need to
-     do as if the caller was the signaling point and estabish the state of the
+     do as if the caller was the signaling point and establish the state of the
      intermediate VMS code (CFA, RA and saved register locations) as if it was
      a single regular function.  This requires special processing.
 
      The datastructures available from an condition dispatcher frame (signal
      context) do not contain the values of most callee-saved registers, so
-     whathever PV designates, we need to account for the registers it saves.
+     whatever PV designates, we need to account for the registers it saves.
 
      Besides, we need to express all the locations with respect to a
      consistent CFA value, so we compute this first.  */

Reply via email to