https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17c7aeffec9e1f7576957fdcb21e380d4e209c6f

commit r17-4806-g17c7aeffec9e1f7576957fdcb21e380d4e209c6f
Author: Dominic P <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Sep 30 07:59:35 2026 +0100

    forwprop: Reset the range of a rewritten MOD result [PR101179]
    
    When X may be negative, r17-3791 still rewrites M = X % PHI <2^a, 2^b>
    into M = X & PHI <2^a-1, 2^b-1> because M is only compared with zero.
    That keeps the zero-ness of M but not its value, yet the range recorded
    for M before the rewrite stays, so VRP folded M to 0 in the testcase.
    Reset the flow-sensitive info of M in that case.
    
    Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu; dg.exp,
    tree-ssa.exp, execute.exp and the new test were also run on
    aarch64-linux-gnu (qemu); no regressions.
    
    Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic)
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            PR tree-optimization/101179
            * tree-ssa-forwprop.cc (simplify_phi_result_movdiv): Reset the
            flow-sensitive info of the result when its value changes.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            PR tree-optimization/101179
            * gcc.dg/torture/pr101179.c: New test.
    
    Signed-off-by: Dominic P <[email protected]>

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr101179.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc                | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr101179.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr101179.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0493c01b6260
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr101179.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+static int __attribute__((noinline))
+f (int a, int b, int x, int p, int q)
+{
+  if (x > -1 || x < -100)
+    return 5;
+  int y;
+  if (a)
+    y = p;
+  else
+    y = q;
+  int m = x % y;
+  if (b)
+    return 7;
+  if (m == 0)
+    return 1;
+  return 2;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  volatile int one = 1, zero = 0, v = -100;
+  if (f (one, zero, v, 64, 16) != 2)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc
index 64956b05985a..f341514a8eb8 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc
@@ -4819,6 +4819,7 @@ simplify_phi_result_movdiv (gimple *stmt, tree_code code)
 {
   tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
   tree_code new_code;
+  bool needs_reset = false;
 
   /* Skip complex types (PR127163) */
   if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhs1)))
@@ -4828,9 +4829,17 @@ simplify_phi_result_movdiv (gimple *stmt, tree_code code)
     {
       case TRUNC_MOD_EXPR:
       case FLOOR_MOD_EXPR:
-       if (!tree_expr_nonnegative_p (rhs1)
-           && !use_in_zero_equality (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt), true))
-         return false;
+       if (!tree_expr_nonnegative_p (rhs1))
+         {
+           /* For a negative X, the truncating X % 2^k and X & (2^k - 1)
+              differ (e.g. -3 % 4 is -3 but -3 & 3 is 1), though both are
+              zero for the same X.  That is enough when the result is only
+              compared with zero, but the range recorded for the MOD result
+              no longer holds for the AND, so reset it.  */
+           needs_reset = true;
+           if (!use_in_zero_equality (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt), true))
+             return false;
+         }
 
        new_code = BIT_AND_EXPR;
        break;
@@ -4889,6 +4898,8 @@ simplify_phi_result_movdiv (gimple *stmt, tree_code code)
 
   gimple_assign_set_rhs2 (stmt, new_phires);
   gimple_assign_set_rhs_code (stmt, new_code);
+  if (needs_reset)
+    reset_flow_sensitive_info (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt));
   update_stmt (stmt);
 
   gsi = gsi_for_phi (phi);

Reply via email to