Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> The attached patch is the same as the last one proposed in the PR.
> Tested against rev 184877 with
>
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,
> -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,
> -m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
>
> and no new failures.
> OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
