> Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> The attached patch is the same as the last one proposed in the PR.
>> Tested against rev 184877 with
>> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
>> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,
>> -m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,
>> -m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
>> and no new failures.
>> OK?
> OK.

I've tested your latest patch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu with trunk
revision 184872.  It looks that some new failures are poping up:

New tests that FAIL:

22_locale/ctype/is/char/3.cc execution test
27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test
gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_6.f90  -Os  execution test

Pehaps failures might be ones you've suggested in #10 in

Could you double check?


Reply via email to