Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refactor the vec_duplicate cost on gpr/fpr2vr-cost param

[Robin Dapp]

Looks much more reasonable, thanks.

I assume the test expectation changes are necessary because the subrtx check 
captures all operations and with the default settings (scalar-vec-cost = 0) we 
always prefer vv over vx/vf?

--
Regards
Robin