> From: Sharma, Dipesh <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2026 1:52 PM
>
> > From: Haochen Jiang <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 19 August 2026 11:19
> > +
> > +#define _tile_ace_loadconfig(A) \
> > + __builtin_ia32_ldtilecfg (A)
> > +
> > +#define _tile_ace_storeconfig(A) \
> > + __builtin_ia32_sttilecfg (A)
> > +
>
> Can we prefer to use functional intrins here for the load and store just like
> amx-tile does ?
>
We are sharing builtins just like all the previous cases. This is already the
simplest way to do that.
> > +extern __inline void
> > +__attribute__((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))
> > +_tile_ace_release (void)
> > +{
> > + __asm__ volatile ("tilerelease" ::);
> > +}
> Since we aim to use builtins for all the instructions, is it possible to not
> implement this in inline assembly and use a builtin instead?
I mentioned that in changelog:
For tilerelease, we keep it simple for now to use inline assembly since
no tmm register number need to be mentioned for the intrin and using
pattern does not help compiler knowing the dependency.
Thx,
Haochen
