On Thu, 28 Aug 2025, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > I find the classification this would provide useful, like I like the > > (internal compiler error) classification we already have. I would > > of course not duplicate all of th eabove message but only > > '(unrecognizable insn)' in the above case. > It's not the only consideration, but keep in mind that such output is not > stable and will cause some headaches with scripting that compares two summary > files.
Classifications really don't belong in the test name (the thing after "PASS: " or "FAIL: ", until end of line) at all, they belong as separate metadata so the set of test names can be stable when the testsuite itself doesn't change. Unfortunately DejaGnu output doesn't have any clean way to provide such metadata for a test result that can be reliably associated with it but is clearly separate from the test name. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
