Re: changes requesting for GCC 17 Release Criteria (secondary targets)

[Jeffrey Law via Gcc]

On 3/24/2026 7:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I think the useful thing we get out of this data is what ports _not_
to consider (those w/o any coverage).  The data of course lacks any
info on the actual port status (number of FAIL, number of UNSUPPORTED)
and how those evolve over time.
Yea, that's probably a reasonable way to look at it.  If nothing's going 
to that list, then I woudn't consider it at all.

Jeff