On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, Jeffrey Law wrote: > > > On 3/24/2026 2:03 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > I'd like to see comments from the respective old/new triplets > > target/OS maintainers, > > in particular this request should probably be split up. > > > > I agree to _add_ riscv64-linux-gnu for GCC 17. > That seems quite reasonable and I wouldn't go any further than that for riscv > until such time as there's dramatically better performing hardware with wide > availability. And no, the upcoming K3s don't meet my view of dramatically > better. > > My x86_64 tests run in 1-2hrs on skylake era systems. riscv on the K1 designs > is nearly 30 hours. At best I expect the K3 to cut that down to 15 hours. > The pioneer (c920 design) is just 7-8 hours, but it's been discontinued and > they've been pretty flakey.
Yes, it seems to be still fastest to do qemu-user based testing on x86-64 for riscv ... But I guess riscv(32?) is relevant as a cross target for embedded use. This is a list of secondary _targets_, not hosts, after all ;) Richard.
