Janis Johnson wrote: >> But it looks like libdecnumber is processed in stage 1. What if the >> stage 1 compiler doesn't handle C++ comments? > > Right, decNumber is used in the C compiler and it's the C++ comments > that convinced me of the need to modify the sources. While I'm at it I > might as well get rid of CRLF (col does that nicely), and after that > it's no more work to run it through indent so it will look like our > other code.
I think it's fine to put this upgrade in, assuming all the usual testing. FWIW, keeping this as much like the upstream sources as possible seems desirable to me; I'd probably do the C++ comments and leave it at that, just to ease future merges. But, that's just my two cents. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
