On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 17:16 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > I can't find any test results in > gcc-testresults reported with -mtune=itanium1 [1]. Those people who > still use Itanium1 are probably better off if they stick with the > older GCC releases (pre-gcc-3.4) because at least back then, Itanium1 > received maybe some testing (there were regressions reported against > gcc 3.4, for example, by H.J. Lu).
Hi, The compile farm machine gcc41 is a Merced based machine: gue...@gcc41:~/build/gcc$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor : GenuineIntel arch : IA-64 family : 7 model : 0 model name : Merced revision : 6 archrev : 0 features : standard cpu number : 0 cpu regs : 4 cpu MHz : 733.441 itc MHz : 733.441016 BogoMIPS : 731.13 siblings : 1 And provides 4.4 testresults, latest looks good: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg02027.html We also have a Madison machine gcc60: gue...@gcc60:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor : GenuineIntel arch : IA-64 family : 31 model : 1 model name : Madison revision : 5 archrev : 0 features : branchlong cpu number : 0 cpu regs : 4 cpu MHz : 1300.000 itc MHz : 1300.000000 BogoMIPS : 1946.41 siblings : 1 Now I don't know if gcc41 falls in your -mtune=itanium1 category or not. That said if it does I don't oppose removing itanium1, we'll just turn off the gcc41 machine when the 4.4 branch last release is done. Sincerely, Laurent
