On 6/7/10, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 14:09, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> threads that haven't been addressed. I offered to Ian to do the same > >> thing for the whole mailing list if we can make it a policy that > >> people who commit changes do what Kai is doing so that it's clear that > >> the thread is done with. I don't mind throwing a few pings down, and > >> I already have the whole ML tagged with a gmail label. > > > > Seems like a good idea to me. I do not usually read the list every > > day (or every week some times), so if a patch is in my area and I had > > not been directly CC'd, it can take me up to 2 weeks to get to it. > > > > Most of the areas I'm on had good coverage (particularly since I share > > much with richi who is a very prolific patch reviewer), so it's not > > too much of a problem. > > Ok. Is one person responding enough for me to start doing that? I > don't know how this sort of approval / acceptance process works for > GCC.
Excellent idea and thanks for volunteering.. M