On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Roman Kononov <ro...@binarylife.net> wrote:
>>2) define a copy constructor, explicitly-defaulted if you wish. > > What if the copy constructor is too expensive and I have to use move > constructor? the discussion would be less confused if you identify clearly the language semantics (as currently present in the C++0x WD) that g++ gets wrong.
