2010-11-30 21:20 CST, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> said: >We do. The point is your question is off-topic on this list, because >you are complaining about the C++0x language, which as far as we know >GCC implements correctly. If you don't like the language, complain >somewhere else. >
Then please tell me which part of the standard makes the mentioned code invalid? I'm not complaining and I like the language. My point is that I'm trying to find a loophole in the standard so that g++, without violating the standard, could allow move-and-destroy of constants. Thanks.
