On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Robert Dewar <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/12/2012 5:40 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > >> It isn't non-sense just because you decide so or you don't like the >> observation. >> >>> and >>> nonsense now, this has nothing to do with incompleteness! > > > I think you don't know what incompleteness is about, yes, it is
Do not allow yourself to be easily confused by misunderstanding of Geodelization, a *process* of assigning numbers to entities http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/Goedelization/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing%27s_proof and make statement only in terms of those numbers and the incompleteness theorems themselves, lest you might give the impression that you do not know what you are talking about and all you need as evidence of target of your message is to look in mirror. -- Gaby > nonsense, because no one can make any sense out of it except you > and you refuse to elaborate or explain beyond just repeating > the observation. Feel free to explain. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- Gaby >>> >>> >>> >
