On 06/12/2018 06:22 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
I tried tweaking the make file. I am probably missing something. Please advise.
Hi.
Next time please send diff. It's easier to read it. You'll need something like:
diff --git a/gcc/lto/config-lang.in b/gcc/lto/config-lang.in
index 7cb7a7752a1..52e452af5f3 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/config-lang.in
+++ b/gcc/lto/config-lang.in
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
# <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
language="lto"
-compilers="lto1\$(exeext)"
-stagestuff="lto1\$(exeext)"
+compilers="lto1\$(exeext) lto-dump\$(exeext)"
+stagestuff="lto1\$(exeext) lto-dump\$(exeext)"
gtfiles="\$(srcdir)/lto/lto-tree.h \$(srcdir)/lto/lto-lang.c \$(srcdir)/lto/lto.c \$(srcdir)/lto/lto.h"
And please rename it to lto-dump.
Martin
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
On 06/08/2018 07:16 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
-fdump-lto-body=foo
will dump gimple body of the function foo
foo (int a, int b)
{
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741825]:
_3 = a_1(D) + b_2(D);
return _3;
}
Please find the diff file attached herewith.
Regards,
Hrishikesh
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
On 06/08/2018 03:40 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
There's wrong declaration of the function in header file. I'll fix it soon
on trunk. Please carry on with following patch:
Fixed in r261327.
Martin
Hi.
Thanks for another new option. I have some comments:
1) remove these files from git branch:
diff --git a/gcc/cscope.out b/gcc/cscope.out
diff --git a/gcc/err b/gcc/err
2) You have repeated pattern:
FOR_EACH_SYMBOL (node)
if (!strcmp (flag_lto_dump_symbol, node->name ()))
some_action();
Let's come up with function symtab->find_symbol_by_name.
Martin
