Dear Alfred and Alexandre, It seems that neither of you would like to offer any evidence that counteracts what I have already been given by multiple individuals. Furthermore,
Alexandre: > A misguided person thought that reciprocating the doxxing against RMS > was a good way to defend him. It's not Alfred: > The claims about doxxing, etc, are entierly untrue and unfounded. Either this happened, or it didn't. Alexandre says that some doxxing, possibly in retaliation to original doxxing, occurred. Alfred says everything is unfounded and untrue, point blank, no details. I do not know which of you to believe, which mix is true, and at this point I don't think I want to know because it's incredibly clear nobody wants to be publicly clear about it, even after my offer to have the details sent to me so I can have an informed opinion and not a piecemeal understanding. Okay, fine. I support Nathan's inquiry. Best of luck, JeanHeyd On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 AM Alfred M. Szmidt <a...@gnu.org> wrote: > > I ("new moderator") won't recount what happened, it is neither here, > or there, but Mark is presenting a very biased view of what occured, > and also one of the reasons why he no longer is a moderator. > > The claims about doxxing, etc, are entierly untrue and unfounded.