Re: A suggestion for going forward from the RMS/FSF debate

[Paul Koning via Gcc]

> On Apr 16, 2021, at 2:41 PM, NightStrike via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> ...
> 
> I was under the (likely incorrect, please enlighten me) impression
> that the meteoric rise of LLVM had more to do with the license
> allowing corporate contributors to ship derived works in binary form
> without sharing proprietary code. 

My impression is a variation on this: that LLVM is in substantial part 
motivated by a desire to avoid GPL V3.  And that there wasn't such a push when 
GPL V2 was the version in general use.

        paul