gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-06-27 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240623 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [no subject] Ernesto via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240622 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240621 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
• pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy CH HC via Gcc
  • Re: pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240620 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 11.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC 12.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC 12.4 Released Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240619 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Union initialization semantics Alexander Monakov
  • Re: Union initialization semantics Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Union initialization semantics Martin Uecker via Gcc
• Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240616 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240615 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240614 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: Minor correction Gerald Pfeifer
• gcc-12-20240613 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org William Seurer via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Iain Sandoe via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
  • Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: “ira_may_move_out_cost” vs “ira_register_move_cost” Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240612 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mark Wielaard
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
  • Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"? Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: How to represent a fallthrough condtion (with no else) in "Match and Simplify"? Richard Biener via Gcc
• Hosting a Mirror Site Ganesh Ram via Gcc
  • Re: Hosting a Mirror Site Ganesh Ram via Gcc
• Gifting This Piano Out. Mary Grieshop via Gcc
• Кавайное меню J’PAN х Sweet Lavka и подарки 🎁 J'PAN via Gcc
• [Committed] IBM Z: Fix ICE in expand_perm_as_replicate Andreas Krebbel via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240609 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240608 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• ਪੀਜੀਐਨਪੀ Labbu Singh via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240607 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240606 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Dimitar Dimitrov
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Mikael Pettersson via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to target a processor with very primitive addressing modes? Georg-Johann Lay
• libgcov on a standalone platform embedded controller Christopher Campbell via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240605 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Which GCC version start to support RISC-V RVV1.0 黃國鎭
  • Re: Which GCC version start to support RISC-V RVV1.0 Jeff Law via Gcc
• What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Andi Kleen via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? FX Coudert via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Andreas Schwab via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Iain Sandoe via Gcc
  • Re: What is the purpose of these two fixincludes? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System via Gcc
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System via Gcc
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
  • Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Mail Delivery System
• Order for springs Harry Russell via Gcc
• Летнее фестивальное меню J'PAN via Gcc
• Partial vector Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Partial vector Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Partial vector Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• Epiphany target Andreas Olofsson via Gcc
  • Re: Epiphany target Jeff Law via Gcc
• Attribute with identifiers arguments דידי אפשטיין via Gcc
• GCC trouble in dump_printf_loc weizhe wang via Gcc
  • Re: GCC trouble in dump_printf_loc Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 😎☀️ Теперь на чилле, на расслабоне KOOK via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240602 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240601 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240531 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: How to avoid some built-in expansions in gcc? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 答复: Re: Is fcommon related with performance optimization logic? Zhaohaifeng(Clark,CIS-HCE) via Gcc
  • 答复: Re: Is fcommon related with performance optimization logic? Zhaohaifeng(Clark,CIS-HCE) via Gcc
• Bytv h v Robert Enriquez via Gcc
• Question about generating vpmovzxbd instruction without using the interfaces in immintrin.h Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about generating vpmovzxbd instruction without using the interfaces in immintrin.h Hongtao Liu via Gcc
  • Re: Question about generating vpmovzxbd instruction without using the interfaces in immintrin.h Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240530 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: Sourceware @ Conservancy - Year One Mark Wielaard
• Is fcommon related with performance optimization logic? 赵海峰 via Gcc
  • Re: Is fcommon related with performance optimization logic? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Is fcommon related with performance optimization logic? David Brown via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240529 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• libstdc++ and missing RUNPATH Sad Clouds via Gcc
  • Re: libstdc++ and missing RUNPATH Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: libstdc++ and missing RUNPATH Sad Clouds via Gcc
  • Re: libstdc++ and missing RUNPATH Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: libstdc++ and missing RUNPATH Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: libstdc++ and missing RUNPATH Sad Clouds via Gcc
• Archaeology time: Help me identify these ancient OSes and vendors Zack Weinberg via Gcc
  • Re: Archaeology time: Help me identify these ancient OSes and vendors John Marshall via Gcc
• Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Paul Eggert
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Paul Eggert
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Paul Eggert
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: configure adds -std=gnu++11 to CXX variable Joseph Myers via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages