gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • [[gnu::null_terminated_string_arg(1)]] on strtol(1) (was: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like) functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions LIU Hao via Gcc
  • [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • RE: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Daniel Plakosh
  • Re: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • RE: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Daniel Plakosh
  • WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier G. Branden Robinson via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Paul Eggert
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• GCC Download Issue Dinesh M via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Download Issue Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240704 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• DW_TAG_compile_unit's references to .debug_line and .loc directive extension Fangrui Song
  • Re: DW_TAG_compile_unit's references to .debug_line and .loc directive extension Fangrui Song
• Ccccc. C. C. Susan Difraia via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240703 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gmplib.org Down Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
  • Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
• Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Florian Weimer
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240630 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• FUCK YOU WG21 FOR THIS import std; BS THAT BREAKS MY LIBRARY. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
  • unwanted communication Mark Wielaard
• gcc-14-20240629 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Dry Ft Bob Lange
• gas or as generates large bins Houssem H1 via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240628 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Please help MR DEEPAK via Gcc
  • Re: Please help Mohd Kashif via Gcc
• About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Basile Starynkevitch
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Iain Sandoe
• gcc-12-20240627 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• gcc-11-20240626 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Richard Biener via Gcc
  • IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Thomas Koenig via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-06-27 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
  • Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240623 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [no subject] Ernesto via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240622 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Liviu Ionescu
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240621 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: SARIF support in GCC: wiki page and BZ keyword David Malcolm via Gcc
• pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy CH HC via Gcc
  • Re: pb_ds gp_hash_table resize strategy Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240620 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 11.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC 12.4.1 Status Report (2024-06-20) Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC 12.4 Released Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• gcc-11-20240619 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Union initialization semantics Alexander Monakov
  • Re: Union initialization semantics Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Union initialization semantics Martin Uecker via Gcc
• Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Georg-Johann Lay
  • Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240616 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: check_qualified_type Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240615 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Ryan Libby via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: -Wcast-qual consistency with initialization conversion and double pointer types Martin Uecker via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240614 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: Minor correction Gerald Pfeifer
• gcc-12-20240613 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: GCC 12.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org William Seurer via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages