In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter Naulls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My belief is that GDB, as a command line application would probably
> be straight forward - you'd have to import the libbfd changes
> from our binutils and perhaps some other stuff, but it's not
> overly difficult.
>
> However, and I'm prepared to entertain counter arguments,
> is that GDB for RISC OS is of limited value, even over DDT, nasty
> as it is, and certainly not over the more recent commercial
> option whose name I forgot for the moment and in fact have never
> used, because the effort of integrating into the Wimp or even
> working with task windows is likely to be huge. Plus those
> apps know all about RISC OS, where as GDB knows, well, nothing
> except that it can run some ARM ELF-based stuff with a funky stack
> model.
Using GDB as remote debugger looks attractive to me.
John.
--
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home BASS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ARM powered, RISC OS driven
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list [email protected]
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
