In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls wrote: > Adam wrote: > > [snip: GDB] > My belief is that GDB, as a command line application would probably > be straight forward - you'd have to import the libbfd changes > from our binutils and perhaps some other stuff, but it's not > overly difficult. > > However, and I'm prepared to entertain counter arguments, > is that GDB for RISC OS is of limited value, even over DDT, nasty > as it is, and certainly not over the more recent commercial > option whose name I forgot for the moment
DeskDebug. Though as far as I'm aware you can't use it with GCC. > [snip] > > [Sourcery] The current version won't work with GCC4 out of the box.) > > I don't know what the details are, but GCC 4 for RISC OS will really be > no different in use from the existing GCC 3.4 in many cases Sourcery uses a "Via" file by default. I suspect this is fixable by the Sourcery user as all the tools, tool chains, project type, code types etc are completely customisable. However, it's not something I've looked into as in the end I bit the bullet and spent an hour or so reading up on how to write makefiles instead. Cheers, Adam -- Adam Richardson Carpe Diem http://www.snowstone.org.uk/riscos/ _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
