Howard Butler wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
Motion: To approve RFC 24 - GDAL Progressive Data Support.
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc24_progressive_data_support
--
I've incorporated adjustments based on the feedback in the last few
days, and now I'd like to move to formally adopt RFC 24.
+0. I do not feel qualified to vote for this, but if people are happy enough
with its GDAL'ishness, ok with me.
Same here: +0. I have read and understand most of the RFC and I like it,
but since I'm not familiar enough with that part of GDAL I may be
missing some issues so I'll let those in the know make the final call.
Daniel
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
