+1
BTW: I couldn't review the recent implementation in detail, however I would suggest using the functions defined recently in cpl_atomic_ops.cpp to access the volatile variables by multiple threads to prevent from the possible issues pointed out in: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2648 Best regards, Tamas 2010/3/16 Frank Warmerdam <[email protected]> > Folks, > > Motion: To approve RFC 24 - GDAL Progressive Data Support. > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc24_progressive_data_support > > -- > > I've incorporated adjustments based on the feedback in the last few > days, and now I'd like to move to formally adopt RFC 24. > > Best regards, > -- > > ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, > [email protected] > light and sound - activate the windows | > http://pobox.com/~warmerdam<http://pobox.com/%7Ewarmerdam> > and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
