GDAL autotests are looking good on Win64. Futher tests are welcome. Best regards,
Tamas 2012/1/2 Etienne Tourigny <[email protected]> > What is the status of Windows 32-bit and 64-bit ? Have they been > tested outside of Tamas' build bot? > > best wishes for 2012, > Etienne > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Even Rouault > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 02:38:00, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : > >> Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 release candidate as > >> the final GDAL/OGR 1.9.0 release. > >> > > > > I've managed to compile it (or the betas) on a variety of Unixes (CentOS > 6.2, > > Ubuntu 11.10, FreeBSD 8.0, NetBSD 5, OpenBSD 4.5, Solaris 10 and 11, > Debian > > Lenny on a big-endian host) and things seem to be in good shape. > > > > Has anyone tested on MacOS X ? > > > > The only regression I've found so far is in the Rasterlite driver ( > fixed in > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4413 ). It was hidden by another > problem in > > the lastest libspatialite3.0.0 that was exhibited by the GDAL autotests. > But I > > don't think it justifies another RC per se. > > > > *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've > found > > a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when > > sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite 3.3.6, but we > now > > use various methods that weren't yet available. This is now fixed in > trunk and > > 1.9 branch (see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4418 for details ). > Not sure > > if it is worth a RC2. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Even > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
