+1 for a rc2, including fixes and netcdf-4 testing for osx and Even's bugfixes.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > Selon Daniel Morissette <[email protected]>: > >> On 12-01-01 11:30 AM, Even Rouault wrote: >> > >> > *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've >> found >> > a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when >> > sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite 3.3.6, but we >> now >> > use various methods that weren't yet available. This is now fixed in trunk >> and >> > 1.9 branch (see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4418 for details ). Not >> sure >> > if it is worth a RC2. >> > >> >> A RC2 would sound like a good idea to me, just to make sure all the last >> minute fixes are tested on various platforms before going out the door. > > If we decided to release RC1 (which would consist in renaming the > gdal-1.9.0rc1.tar.gz into gdal-1.9.0.tar.gz), the above fixes in the 1.9 > branch > would not be included in it, so it won't break for other platforms. > > But it might be perhaps interesting to have an RC2 with some of the build > fixes > identified by William. I'll try to have a look tonight. > >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Morissette >> http://www.mapgears.com/ >> Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
