William, I have created the following ticket, please add any information there, especially the patch to configure. I will see how to resolve that issue on linux also.
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4424 The CF compliance checks (in netcdf_cf.py) can be skipped safely and are optional, no need to install the cfchecker. The important tests are in netcdf.py which deal with netcdf-4. thanks, Etienne On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:46 AM, William Kyngesburye <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, looking good, after patching configure to work around netcdf problems > mentioned. > > Autotests generally OK. Netcdf tests OK, except I need to install cfchecker > to check CF compliance. > > There are a bunch of new tiff_srs_* tests, many that fail. It's dropping > some TOWGS84 options, or some AUTHORITY options for PRIMEM and UNIT, or have > having precision problems (ie 298.3 becomes 298.2999999999985). Probably a > problem with my libgeotiff, other srs tests are fine. > > > On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:46 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote: > >> OK, I have NetCDF now with HDF4/5 & DAP. Now configure problems again >> (again, netcdf is static library, as are HDF4, HDF5 and DAP): >> >> My netcdf needs curl (it defaults to using curl), but GDAL doesn't test >> netcdf with that (curl is tested much later). >> >> Netcdf4 also needs some symbols from libhdf5_hl, but this is not checked for. >> >> >> On Jan 3, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Etienne Tourigny wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> I would appreciate minimal testing for netcdf-4 in osx before >>> releasing rc2 (which should take a few days at the most). >>> >>> Wiliam: >>> >>> The driver in 1.9 includes support for netcdf-4, which uses hdf5 for >>> storage and supports deflate compression as well as a new data model. >>> Other important bugfixes and support for CF-1.5 have been included as >>> well.There are also some new autotests that are skipped if netcdf-4 is >>> not available to GDAL, if these pass the build should be fine. >>> >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:47 AM, William Kyngesburye >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I've always built netcdf without v4 API because GDAL didn't support it. I >>>> missed that addition in GDAL 1.9, so it looks like I have more work for >>>> compilation and testing ;) >>>> >>>> I saw some time ago that HDF5 added some capbility for integration with >>>> netcdf4, GDAL 1.9 supports this now? > > ----- > William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com> > http://www.kyngchaos.com/ > > "The beast is actively interested only in now, and, as it is always now and > always shall be, there is an eternity of time for the accomplishment of > objects." > > - the wisdom of Tarzan > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
