Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered.
Since the call for discussion, I've made a change in the RFC and proposed implementation so that the GDALRasterIOExtraArg* psExtraArg argument of RasterIO() remains optional for out-of-tree C++ code, but compulsory for in- tree code : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress?action=diff&version=4&old_version=3 https://github.com/rouault/gdal2/commit/31a814acd091c93bd498b4b8c219b83bb40bb3ae So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
