+1 Tamas
2014-12-01 19:48 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. > > Since the call for discussion, I've made a change in the RFC and proposed > implementation so that the GDALRasterIOExtraArg* psExtraArg argument of > RasterIO() remains optional for out-of-tree C++ code, but compulsory for > in- > tree code : > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress?action=diff&version=4&old_version=3 > > https://github.com/rouault/gdal2/commit/31a814acd091c93bd498b4b8c219b83bb40bb3ae > > So: > > Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and > progress callback > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress > > Starting with my +1 > > Best regards, > > Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
