I would be interested in doing this, I can probably create a doc that outlines JP2/NITF C8 at a high level.
Most of the JP2 people I know (myself included) aren't doing JP2 anymore, but it is a very useful format. Norman On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Jukka Rahkonen < [email protected]> wrote: > Norman Barker <norman <at> cloudant.com> writes: > > > > Even, Jukka, > > > > the NPJE end EPJE specifications are both good for understanding > progression order in JP2. It all depends on what you are trying to do, so a > default is just that, something that can be changed. > > > > A JP2 file with PLT markers (packet markers) in my experience removes > most > of the overhead of accessing packets as the header decoding doesn't have to > be performed. > > > > I fear that only few people understand really JP2 and I do not count me in. > It is our responsibility to try to offer reasonable defaults for we > consider > as standard geospatial image, let's say 15000 by 15000 pixels, RGB. > > -Jukka- > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
