Even Rouault <even.rouault <at> spatialys.com> writes:
> When reading with an efficient JPEG2000 decoder, for the same block size, I > can't see any really noticeable difference between the 3 profiles, either when > reading a single pixel, random regions at full resolution, or a downsampled > region. I presume the difference between the organizations would appear in > network streaming contexts rather than with an efficient storage and reader. Now once you say it I remember why I had a feeling of LRCP being so poor. It was based an my tests I made a long time ago about serving images for on-screen browsing through JPIP by using a dial-up modem and speed throttled to 4 kbps. Very different use case indeed. -Jukka- _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
