Armin, I've committed a fix in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5875 that should hopefully fix your issue. There was a problem with the presence of non spatial tables that could cause later tables not to be listed. This wasn't specifically related to feature classes.
Even > Hi Even > > thanks for the reply! > > The FGDB dataset where I discovered that has unfortunately some > commercial IPR restrictions, so I cannot share it (and it in addition > has some 800 MB...). I will try to create a test FGDB with a similar > internal structure, I have to check if I can create an FGDB v9 format > with recent ArcGIS versions. > > Armin > > > On 03/10/2015 06:48 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > > Selon Armin Burger <[email protected]>: > > > >> Dear all > >> > >> I have a question regarding the OpenFileGDB driver in 1.11.2 release. It > >> now lists also non-spatial tables as layers of an FGDB (as mentioned in > >> the changelog). But it seems to not list any more layers that are > >> "feature classes" under a parent "feature dataset" (that's how the > >> relation is displayed in ArcGIS). This is at least the case for FGDB's > >> in older v9 format. In GDAL version 1.11.0 these feature classes were > >> still listed as layers. > >> > >> Is this a bug or an intended behavior? > >> > > > > Looks like an unfortunate side effect. could you open a ticket and attach > such a > > GDB or provide a link to it ? > > > > > >> Best regards > >> Armin > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gdal-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >> > > > > > -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
