Selon Armin Burger <[email protected]>: > Hi Even > > Thanks a lot again! I added the fix to the current 1.11.2 version and > afterwards everything was fine, all layers in the FGDB v9 were found.
Cool. It would be usefull if someone could provide a as small as possible FGDB v9 dataset to be used for regression testing. Let's say with a layer with a point, another one with a line, another one with a polygon, multipoint, etc... One no-spatial layer. One feature dataset layer. Something similar to http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/trunk/autotest/ogr/data/testopenfilegdb.gdb.zip but generated by ArcGIS v9. It wouldn't have necessary caught this bug, but that would be at least a start. > > Cheers > Armin > > > On 03/15/2015 04:08 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > > Armin, > > > > I've committed a fix in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5875 that should > > hopefully fix your issue. There was a problem with the presence of non > spatial > > tables that could cause later tables not to be listed. This wasn't > specifically > > related to feature classes. > > > > Even > > > >> Hi Even > >> > >> thanks for the reply! > >> > >> The FGDB dataset where I discovered that has unfortunately some > >> commercial IPR restrictions, so I cannot share it (and it in addition > >> has some 800 MB...). I will try to create a test FGDB with a similar > >> internal structure, I have to check if I can create an FGDB v9 format > >> with recent ArcGIS versions. > >> > >> Armin > >> > >> > >> On 03/10/2015 06:48 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > >>> Selon Armin Burger <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>>> Dear all > >>>> > >>>> I have a question regarding the OpenFileGDB driver in 1.11.2 release. It > >>>> now lists also non-spatial tables as layers of an FGDB (as mentioned in > >>>> the changelog). But it seems to not list any more layers that are > >>>> "feature classes" under a parent "feature dataset" (that's how the > >>>> relation is displayed in ArcGIS). This is at least the case for FGDB's > >>>> in older v9 format. In GDAL version 1.11.0 these feature classes were > >>>> still listed as layers. > >>>> > >>>> Is this a bug or an intended behavior? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Looks like an unfortunate side effect. could you open a ticket and attach > >> such a > >>> GDB or provide a link to it ? > >>> > >>> > >>>> Best regards > >>>> Armin > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> gdal-dev mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
