> > On 2015-04-01 11:17, Daniel Morissette wrote: > >> Good morning Even, > >> > >> That sounds like an ambitious world (universe?) domination plan, but > >> before going too deep into the implementation details, can you comment > >> on the potential for real life widespread adoption of such a universal > >> format in a world where everyone and their dog wants to have their own > >> file format which is so much better than everybody else's? > >> > >> In other words: GML failed in a similar attempt to replace all other > >> formats, so despite the benefits of BF over XML encoding, what would > >> give UFO more chances of succeeding?
For a really good reason: XML isn't Turing complete (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness#Data_languages ) -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
