That was a very good Poisson d'Avril Even! http://www.francetravelguide.com/april-fools-day-in-france-le-poisson-davril.html
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:11:36 +0200 > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] UFO format / GDAL 3.0 > > > > > On 2015-04-01 11:17, Daniel Morissette wrote: > > >> Good morning Even, > > >> > > >> That sounds like an ambitious world (universe?) domination plan, but > > >> before going too deep into the implementation details, can you comment > > >> on the potential for real life widespread adoption of such a universal > > >> format in a world where everyone and their dog wants to have their own > > >> file format which is so much better than everybody else's? > > >> > > >> In other words: GML failed in a similar attempt to replace all other > > >> formats, so despite the benefits of BF over XML encoding, what would > > >> give UFO more chances of succeeding? > > For a really good reason: XML isn't Turing complete (source: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness#Data_languages ) > > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
