On jeudi 10 août 2017 20:04:09 CEST Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Even
> 
> abidiff tells me:
> 
> 
> * Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
> openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s).
> Please review them.
> 
> ================ changes of 'libopenjp2.so.2.1.2'===============
>    Functions changes summary: 9 Removed, 5 Changed, 31 Added functions
>    Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
> 
>    9 Removed functions:
> 
>      'function void opj_mqc_create()'    {opj_mqc_create}
>      'function OPJ_INT32 opj_mqc_decode()'    {opj_mqc_decode}
>      'function void opj_mqc_destroy()'    {opj_mqc_destroy}
>      'function OPJ_UINT32 opj_mqc_restart_enc()'    {opj_mqc_restart_enc}
>      'function void opj_raw_create()'    {opj_raw_create}
>      'function OPJ_UINT32 opj_raw_decode()'    {opj_raw_decode}
>      'function void opj_raw_destroy()'    {opj_raw_destroy}
>      'function void opj_raw_init_dec(OPJ_BYTE*, OPJ_UINT32)'   
> {opj_raw_init_dec} 'function OPJ_UINT32 opj_raw_numbytes()'   
> {opj_raw_numbytes}
> 
> Is the ABI really 100% compatible?

(Should be rather for the openjpeg mailing list)

The functions you mention are internal functions not exposed in the API of 
openjpeg.h and 
that should normally not be exported

http://www.openjpeg.org/abi-check/timeline/openjpeg/ finds 100% compatibility

Even

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to