On 10.08.2017 20:10, Even Rouault wrote:


On jeudi 10 août 2017 20:04:09 CEST Sandro Mani wrote:

> Hi Even

>

> abidiff tells me:

>

>

> * Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and

> openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s).

> Please review them.

>

> ================ changes of 'libopenjp2.so.2.1.2'===============

> Functions changes summary: 9 Removed, 5 Changed, 31 Added functions

> Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable

>

> 9 Removed functions:

>

> 'function void opj_mqc_create()' {opj_mqc_create}

> 'function OPJ_INT32 opj_mqc_decode()' {opj_mqc_decode}

> 'function void opj_mqc_destroy()' {opj_mqc_destroy}

> 'function OPJ_UINT32 opj_mqc_restart_enc()' {opj_mqc_restart_enc}

> 'function void opj_raw_create()' {opj_raw_create}

> 'function OPJ_UINT32 opj_raw_decode()' {opj_raw_decode}

> 'function void opj_raw_destroy()' {opj_raw_destroy}

> 'function void opj_raw_init_dec(OPJ_BYTE*, OPJ_UINT32)'

> {opj_raw_init_dec} 'function OPJ_UINT32 opj_raw_numbytes()'

> {opj_raw_numbytes}

>

> Is the ABI really 100% compatible?

(Should be rather for the openjpeg mailing list)

Yeah sorry was too lazy to subscribe.

The functions you mention are internal functions not exposed in the API of openjpeg.h and that should normally not be exported

http://www.openjpeg.org/abi-check/timeline/openjpeg/ finds 100% compatibility

Okay thanks

Sandro
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to