Hi all, just want to share with you that we've got the same discussion recently in the orfeo toolbox project and we finally decide to move directly to c++14 in the next release (6.2). It is a more recent standard with for sure less new features than in c++11 but yet useful. Moreover it does not change a lot the minimum compiler version (gcc min version is 4.9 I think for c++14).
Will be glad to exchange also with you on strategies, pro/cons to then modernize the code. You can find more information about the discussion about c++11 vs c++14 and few experiments which have been made with clang-tidy for OTB in the following RFComments and RFChanges: https://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/Request_for_Comments-36:_Move_OTB_to_C%2B%2B14 https://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/Request_for_Changes-95:_Compile_OTB_with_C%2B%2B14_by_default my 2 cents. Regards, -- Manuel GRIZONNET CNES - DCT/SI/AP - BPI 1219 18, avenue Edouard Belin 31401 Toulouse Cedex 09 - France Tel: +33 561 282 630 - Fax: +33 561 283 109 ________________________________ De : gdal-dev [[email protected]] de la part de Even Rouault [[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 14 août 2017 19:02 À : Tamas Szekeres Cc : [email protected] Objet : Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC68: C++11 compilation mode Hi Tamas, Unless I'm mistaken your gisinternals.com builds don't include MSVC 2015 currently. Right ? Do you have any plans to do so ? Currently the GDAL AppVeyor target uses SDKSs from gisinternals to do builds with a number of third-party libraries. Even > > This is a call for discussion on RFC68 to set C++11 to be the minimum C++ > language version for GDAL trunk. I've drafted the RFC based on work by > Mateusz. > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc68_cplusplus11 > > There was initial discussions back in January of this year: > > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017-January/thread.html#45786 > > Cheers, > -kurt > Engineer at Google -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
