Thanks for the feedback! I will fix those things today On Aug 16, 2017 5:36 AM, "Even Rouault" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On lundi 14 août 2017 09:44:36 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This is a call for discussion on RFC68 to set C++11 to be the minimum C++ > > > language version for GDAL trunk. I've drafted the RFC based on work by > > > Mateusz. > > > > > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc68_cplusplus11 > > > > > > There was initial discussions back in January of this year: > > > > > > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017- > January/thread.html#45786 > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > There's one aspect that doesn't appear clearly to me in the RFC text, > which is requirements for user C++ code using the GDAL C++ API. I presume > that external code will also have to be compiled in C++11 mode too (because > of nullptr or override keywords appearing in headers like gcore/gdal_priv.h > for example). Would probably be worth making that explicit (perhaps in > "Backward compatibility" paragraph) > > > > Editorial remarks: > > * the reference to "Move OTB to C++14" is after "There are a few related > past RFCs that have never been adopted but strongly relate to RFC 68", but > OTB C++14 has been adopted as far as I can see > > * the reference to CMake in "If accepted, currently available build > configurations (Autotools, CMake, NMake)" doesn't apply for GDAL. Regarding > nmake impacts, there won't be much, apart perhaps removing references to > MSVC versions older than the new minimum one that will be supported. > > > > Even > > > > > > -- > > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > > http://www.spatialys.com >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
