On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now that Tamas has added the msvc2015/2-17SDK's, I'd like to call a vote > by the PSC on RFC68: C++11 compilation mode. > > The draft is here: > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc68_cplusplus11 > I'm late to the party, but I guess I don't understand a few things in the RFC. In Plan: If c++11 mode is enabled, won't ALL code need to be C++11 compliant, rather than just new code? In Core changes and Potential changes: It's not clear to me how these are related to turning on C++ 11 mode. Are the "Core changes" the NECESSARY changes to support the C++11 standard? Are the "not included" features DISALLOWED in future code, or...? Thanks for the clarification. -- Andrew Bell [email protected]
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
