On 6 September 2017 at 19:11, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > On mercredi 6 septembre 2017 19:04:34 CEST Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 6 September 2017 at 18:58, Andrew Bell <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Now that Tamas has added the msvc2015/2-17SDK's, I'd like to call a >> >> vote > >> >> by the PSC on RFC68: C++11 compilation mode. > >> >> > >> >> The draft is here: > >> >> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc68_cplusplus11 > >> > > >> > I'm late to the party, but I guess I don't understand a few things in >> > the > >> > RFC. > >> > > >> > In Plan: If c++11 mode is enabled, won't ALL code need to be C++11 > >> > compliant, rather than just new code? > >> > >> Any existing code which does not compile as C++11 will have to be updated. > > > > This is mostly a theoretical case. We have buildbots that compile in C++11 > and ran tests for a couple of years now (and one in C++14). And by default > (since GDAL 2.2 I think) ./configure already enables C++11 on all C++11 > capable compilers.
Yes, indeed. I gave a 'generic' answer. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
