On 08/07/2020 13:23, Even Rouault wrote:
On mercredi 8 juillet 2020 10:12:31 CEST Landry Breuil wrote:

 > Hi,

 >

 > i'm converting a stock of tiled aerial pictures (from distinct

 > years/campaigns) to COG (using gdal 3.1.0), and trying to stack them via

 > a vrt. the COG arent 'full', in the sense that they have a bbox, but

 > there isnt data *everywhere*. Some of those campaigns/COGs have

 > overlapping BBOXes.

 >

 > the COG are built from vrts (assembling all the tiles for the campaign)

 > built with -addalpha, and then using gdal_translate -of COG -b 1 -b 2 -b

 > 3 -mask 4 to have the mask band in the resulting COG, ie i get 3 bands

 > with a 'per-dataset mask':

 >

 > Band 1 Block=512x512 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Red

 > Overviews: 148000x172000, 74000x86000, 37000x43000, 18500x21500,

 > 9250x10750, 4625x5375, 2313x2688, 1157x1344, 579x672, 290x336

 > Mask Flags: PER_DATASET

 > Overviews of mask band: 148000x172000, 74000x86000, 37000x43000,

> 18500x21500, 9250x10750, 4625x5375, 2313x2688, 1157x1344, 579x672, 290x336

 >

 > i have zero issue loading the separate COGs in QGIS (locally or via

 > vsicurl), the nodata areas are properly displayed as transparent,

 > loading several COGs on top of each other properly render the

 > overlapping areas, ie if at some coords there's data in the lower COG

 > and nodata in the toplevel COG, then the data from the lower COG is

 > rendered. That can also be achieved via a mapserver GROUP, loading the

 > layers on top of each other, as seen in https://imgur.com/9BgZSTH.png

 >

 > Trying to achieve the same via a vrt file stacking the COGs fails (plain

 > gdalbuildvrt img1.tiff img2.tiff), ie for the same coords, nodata will

 > be rendered if there's nodata in the toplevel COG (even if there's data

 > in the lower COG), and that for the complete BBOX of the toplevel COG

 > (ie outside of the toplevel COG BBOX, data from the lower COGs is

 > displayed). See https://imgur.com/a/HiEfjxY for an example (here, it's

 > via WMS loading as jpeg, using png the white area would be transparent).

 >

 > I tried playing with the various gdalbuildvrt (-addalpha, etc..) options

 > but i still cant figure out what is the correct incantation to achieve

 > my goal (ie tell gdalbuildvrt that there's some kind of 'cutline' around

 > the given COGs ?), so i'm resorting to find hints on the list :)

Landry,

The behaviour you describe is indeed how VRT stacking works currently. Alpha / masks bands are dealt as regular bands. No blending is done.

So that explains why it works with the mapserver GROUP keyword, as it does the blending of the sub-layers.

Long time wish / todo.

Ok, good to know.

Your best option with VRT would be to use a NoData value instead if you can.

You mean setting a nodata value when building the COGs (ie gdal_translate -a_nodata 0 -of COG dataset.vrt dataset.tif) instead of the alpha/mask band, and then using this nodata value as -srcnodata 0 parameter to gdalbuildvrt ?

Or use gdalwarp to create a materialized mosaic.

That would be sub optimal (ie double storage) as i also need to be able to use the distinct campaigns independently.

Landry
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to