application/gdalvrt+xml would just mean what the organization that defines the
format is. People could reimplement that from scratch
Note that there is potentially the OGR VRT format (that could go as
application/ogrvrt+xml), but that is a separate schema and likely less used
than its raster counterpart.
Le 20/04/2021 à 18:04, Sean Gillies via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi Jukka,
It's possible that ArcGIS has independently implemented VRT, but I
think it's more likely that it delegates to GDAL. I think it would be
possible to craft a VRT doc that would reveal some details -- such as
one that uses GDAL's embedded Python pixel functions to dump some
system information -- but I don't have access to ArcGIS to try it.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 4:01 PM jratike80
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
Do you count ArcMap or ArcGIS Pro as self standing software or
rather as
applications that use GDAL? They read VRTs pretty well but for
writing some
developer tools are required
https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/imagery/supported-raster-dataset-file-formats.htm
<https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/imagery/supported-raster-dataset-file-formats.htm>.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
GDAL - Dev mailing list wrote
> Maybe application/gdalvrt+xml? As far as I know, GDAL is the
only software
> that plays VRTs, and probably the only software that ever can,
considering
> the extensions and embedded Python stuff.
>
--
Sean Gillies
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
