Il 07/05/26 02:28, Even Rouault via gdal-dev ha scritto:
Hi,
with a number of drivers being raster+vector our current source tree
organization is a bit messy.
For example, we have:
- ogr/ogrsf_frmts/gpkg: the GeoPackage driver started vector-only and
then raster was added
- frmts/mbtiles: the MBTiles driver started raster-only and then
vector was added
- ogr/ogrsf_frmts/pmtiles: you can guess what I will write here
- frmts/mem
I'm hesitating between:
- putting all drivers below a drivers/ directory
- or having drivers/raster/ , drivers/vector/ and drivers/mixed/
Thoughts? (I'm wondering how such a plan could be executed without
freezing all pull request activity in the meantime to limit conflicts,
although git might perhaps be smart enough to detect files moving around)
Even
I prefer the three directories option, it immediately tells whether we
have to deal with vectors or rasters or both.
Cheers
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
