On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 11:06 AM Daniel Baston via gdal-dev < [email protected]> wrote:
> While the current organization is definitely not what we'd start with, I'm > not sure the benefits or reorganization are worth making it harder to > follow the commit history. > This. In particular it's a hassle to trace changes when directories vanish. I think people get used to any arrangement. If this is going to happen, perhaps there are other changes that could be done at the same time. For example, I find it difficult when the header file names don't match the corresponding source files or the classes contained therein. Since I don't work on GDAL every day, I end up spending a bunch of time searching around for things that could be obvious through naming. I also don't love having source files in a separate directory from the headers. (I get that these are perhaps personal preferences not shared by others.) That said, leaving things alone wouldn't be a bad decision, IMO. -- Andrew Bell [email protected]
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
